For a 120-inch screen, the throw distance ranges from 11.5 to 18.75 feet. The 3800 also offers excellent placement flexibility, especially for the price, starting with the 1.62x zoom lens. I measured Bright Cinema at roughly 2,270 lumens, which is enough to light up a 120-inch diagonal 1.0-gain screen in moderate ambient light. More important, all the other modes offer good color accuracy with default settings, and some offer ample brightness for a family room with lights on. But combined with Epson's 4K PRO-UHD technology-a collection of features designed to enhance detail-and Epson's 12-element, high-quality glass lens, it delivers an actual ability to resolve detail that rivals, and in some cases surpasses, the detail in images with more pixels.Īs with the vast majority of projectors, the brightest mode has a green bias, but it's little enough that most people will still consider it usable on an occasional basis when needed. That's fewer pixels than native 4K projectors or pixel-shifting DLP 4K projectors deliver. If the price difference between the two models remains this small, you'll want to take a close look at the 4010 before you decide on the 3800.Įpson's approach to pixel shifting puts twice as many pixels on screen as are in the native 1080p chips. The 4010's powered lens controls also works in tandem with onboard memory to let you easily change lens settings as needed for a constant image height setup. Epson rates the 3800's contrast ratio at just half of the 4010's specification. Nor does it have the higher end, 15-element glass lens used on the 40UB, the same ability as those projectors to deliver 100% of the DCI-P3 color space for UHD content, or the same level of contrast. However, it doesn't share the 4010's powered zoom, focus, and lens shift, a major convenience compared with the 3800's manual control for all three. Like the 5050UB, it also has HDMI 2.0b ports, giving it the 18 Gbps bandwidth needed for display of 4K content with HDR at 60 Hz. In addition, unlike the 4010, it adds HLG HDR support to the HDR10 they both offer, and uses the more advanced, 16-step HDR brightness control first introduced in Epson's Home Cinema 5050UB. Note that the 3800 has the advantage of being smaller and lighter. The other obvious comparison for the 3800 is the Epson Home Cinema 4010, which Epson's website is selling at this writing in late October for $1,799. Beyond these differences, the features and specs for the two are virtually identical. The difference in contrast should be, at 100,000:1 compared with 40,000:1. Based strictly on the ratings-3,000 lumens for the 3800 rather than 2,900 for the 3200-the brightness difference isn't enough to notice. The 3800's slightly higher price compared with the 3200 buys you on-board stereo speakers, a 12V trigger port, an RS-232 port for external control, and-most significantly-higher brightness and contrast ratio. These models officially replace the Home Cinema 3700 and Home Cinema 3100, 1080p models which do" not offer pixel shifting to enhance resolution and do not accept UHD signals. Taken together, they are the latest example of the continuing trend towards lower prices for entry-level 4K home theater projectors-or, more precisely, the price of pixel-shifting, native 1080p projectors that produce images essentially indistinguishable to the human eye from true 4K. The other is the $1,499 Epson Home Cinema 3200. The $1,699 Epson Home Cinema 3800 is the more expensive of two new and similar Epson projectors. Like Epson's bigger and heavier pixel-shifting, 4K-capable models, the Epson Home Cinema 3800 delivers a gorgeous image for 1080p SDR and 4K UHD content along with conveniences like a much larger horizontal and vertical lens shift than typical for the price.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |